• What is CVE-2025-55315?
• Why this vulnerability stands out
• Attack mechanics: How HTTP Request Smuggling works
• Who is affected & versions to track
• How to mitigate the risk now
• Blue-Team checklist: detection, response, testing
• Why defenders should care

What is CVE-2025-55315?

This vulnerability is an “inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests” (an HTTP request/response smuggling variant) in ASP.NET Core (via its Kestrel web server component) that allows an attacker, under certain conditions, to bypass a security feature over a network. The reported base CVSS 3.1 score is 9.9 (Critical): AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L. In plain terms: an attacker could sneak hidden or manipulated HTTP requests through the server, potentially hijack other users’ sessions, access sensitive data, modify files, or force a crash.

Why this vulnerability stands out

• The sheer severity (9.9) is unusually high for request-smuggling flaws in this stack; specialist write-ups call it “the highest-ever severity in ASP.NET Core context”.
• It exploits the HTTP layer (requests/responses) rather than typical logic flaws — meaning it's potentially impactful across many applications built on the framework.
• Because it's in a core web-server component (Kestrel), it affects a broad range of web apps rather than a niche plugin or module.
• The vulnerability can enable multiple threat outcomes: credential theft, bypass of protections (like CSRF, authorization controls), SSRF-style internal request chaining, or file tampering.

How the HTTP Request Smuggling works (attack mechanics)

1. The attacker crafts an HTTP request (or series of requests) that exploit differences in how intermediaries (proxies/load-balancers) and the server itself parse headers like Transfer-Encoding, Content-Length, or ambiguous boundary/terminator behavior. This enables a “smuggled” secondary request to be hidden within a legitimate one (or part thereof).
2. Because the server (ASP.NET Core Kestrel) mis-interprets the boundaries/terminators, the hidden request is processed in addition to or instead of the intended request.
3. The attacker may abuse this to:
   • Perform actions as another user or escalate privileges
   • Bypass authorization/CSRF/antiforgery controls
   • Cause the server to make internal requests (SSRF) or act on behalf of the attacker
   • Modify file content, exfiltrate data or cause service disruption/denial of service
4. The severity (confidentiality, integrity, availability) is high because all three can be impacted depending on the app’s logic and deployment.

Who is affected & versions to track

• Products impacted: ASP.NET Core (various versions) and the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core package.
• Affected version ranges (via vendor/researcher summarisation):
  • ASP.NET Core version 6.0.0 to 6.0.36 (inclusive)
  • ASP.NET Core version 8.0.0 to 8.0.20 (inclusive)
  • ASP.NET Core version 9.0.0 to 9.0.9 (inclusive)
  • Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core version 2.3.0 or earlier
• The vulnerability requires network-accessible HTTP endpoints served by Kestrel; thus web applications built on those frameworks and deployed unpatched are at risk.
• Because many enterprise apps may run older framework versions (6.x, 8.x) or may self-host Kestrel, the exposure is broad.

How to mitigate the risk now

• Immediate actions (within hours):
• Apply the vendor patches/updates for ASP.NET Core / Kestrel as soon as available.
• For applications still on affected versions, schedule update/upgrade to versions beyond the fixed versions.
• If immediate patching is not possible, mitigate exposure by restricting external access to Kestrel endpoints:
  • Place web servers behind a hardened reverse-proxy that enforces strict parsing and header checks.
  • Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) that supports detection/prevention of HTTP request smuggling patterns (ambiguous headers, dual encodings, Transfer-Encoding + Content-Length mismatches).
• Review cloud-hosting or container orchestration configurations to ensure endpoints are not exposed to internet without proper filtering.
• Short-to-mid-term actions (days):
• Conduct an inventory of all ASP.NET Core applications and versions in your environment; tag those using Kestrel directly or self-hosted.
• Implement monitoring/logging for anomalous HTTP request patterns: suspicious header combinations (Transfer-Encoding + Content-Length), unexpected multiple requests within a single TCP connection, or unexpected internal requests generated by the app post-request.
• Harden application logic: ensure input validation, enforce authentication/authorization for all endpoints, validate internal request-routing logic for SSRF/forwarding paths.
• Long-term actions (weeks):
• Upgrade all applications to the latest supported LTS versions of .NET/ASP.NET Core and ensure self-hosted servers use latest Kestrel builds.
• Review application architecture: avoid exposing Kestrel directly to untrusted networks without a proxy; adopt zero-trust internal access models.
• Incorporate HTTP request smuggling awareness and testing into your secure development lifecycle (SDL). Perform code/review tests for ambiguous header handling, boundary parsing, and ensure proxies and application servers interpret HTTP consistently.

Blue-Team checklist (operational)

1. Inventory: List all web apps built on ASP.NET Core; note versions, hosting model (IIS, Kestrel self-hosted, containers).
2. Patch & verify: Confirm the update has been applied; test in staging that the app still correctly handles HTTP requests and that headers like Transfer-Encoding, Content-Length are processed safely.
3. Detection rules:
   • Log when inbound requests include both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers or other suspicious header combos.
   • Monitor for unusually small or empty request bodies with large Content-Length values or chunked encodings that don’t match body size.
   • Watch for downstream internal requests initiated by the app soon after an external request (possible SSRF or request-smuggled chain).
4. Hunt/back-scan: Use logs to search for prior exploitation indicators: header-anomalies, large volumes of requests with ambiguous encoding, internal requests logged without corresponding external request.
5. Containment playbook: If you detect exploitation: isolate the affected server, collect logs + memory dump, disable external access to the app, rebuild from patched code, conduct root-cause analysis.
6. Test: In a safe lab environment, simulate HTTP request smuggling variations (ambiguous headers, dual encodings) against a test ASP.NET Core deployment to validate detection rules and patch efficacy.

Why defenders should care

This vulnerability represents a high-impact web-layer threat for many enterprise applications. Because it targets a core web framework component, its reach is broad. If exploited, the attacker could bypass security controls that many organizations rely on (authentication/authorization/CSRF), access or tamper with data, and even disrupt service availability. Given the 9.9 severity, this should be treated as a priority-one patch and exposure identification should be immediate. Failing to address it could place your web-applications in serious jeopardy of compromise.